I think that art, or music, or film or literature is appreciated by those who see something of themselves in the perspective being illustrated more often than it leaves viewers awe-struck by the beauty or precision of the work itself. I often love a movie because it is well done, but the ones I watch over and over again are those that reached me in some way-- the films that I relate to have characters I'd like to imitate or scenes that look either familiar or desirable to me.
Anyone can see that the work of Monet is brilliant and I enjoy staring at it in amazement on a tour around the National Gallery downtown, but the art I have hanging on my walls at home is the odd black and white photo of a sailboat or two, photographs of sand dunes or beach hammocks I'd like to sit on, or film photography of some of my favorite old actors and actresses whose faces I like best to look at. I like paintings with the right warm tone and my favorite colors, of scenes I'd like to walk through or faces and places that remind me of something friendly and familiar.
I, like anyone, can appreciate something exceptionally beautiful, artfully written, well constructed, enthralling, eye-opening, daring or new. But what interests me is that we live in a world full of artists and of those who appreciate the arts (whether they recognize this or not), and there's no telling whose eyes will be caught or mind captivated by whose illustrated window into their soul. I am reading a book written by the most average of women, in which she talks about her experience with falling in and out of love, seeking the truth, experiencing pleasure, and attempting to live her life with grace and a reasonable degree of attention. The book is not a work of genius, it is just an arbitrary piece of art by one woman that I selected from millions-- her window, if you will.
I wandered through an art gallery on my day off this week, and appreciated the photography of one man and his friends, and his unique way of detailing and narrating each photo in his own handwriting along the bottom of his photos. I enjoyed the classic paintings on the main floor, as I always enjoy beauty, but I was intrigued by his photos because they showed a little piece of him and I was thrilled to peek into that window.
This evening I was too exhausted from work to meet my social engagements, so I stayed in with my spinach salad and stir fry (and a glass of wine and a brownie) to watch a movie I'd heard something about. An Education was just another well-directed coming of age tale, a well-acted and well-written window into the world of another artist, another character. Some might appreciate the film for its artistry, which I did, but I think I was enthralled because I saw a bit of myself in the illustration, or at least found myself understanding the perspective as my mind was able to follow the turns in the plot naturally and lovingly.
I always wonder... when critics say they found a film to be "relatable," do they really mean that they related? How could you fathom what someone else will relate to if you don't relate to it at all? When they say it is charming, do they mean, in fact, that they themselves were charmed? I think looking at a piece of art and trying to determine its effect on the entire world is a lost cause, and quite diminishes the work.
Someone might view a film, painting, or book as possibly well-crafted but for all intensive purposes boring. I don't think this means that the writer is a bore or that the film-maker is a failure, but simply that the art was viewed by the wrong person. My mother reads stacks of books I find terrifically boring, but she is intrigued by what sees through the window those writers are providing. I have fallen asleep in the middle of some particularly epic movies that I won't list here, and been wide eyed and grinning with interest and affection for the silliest of films at 3 am when I've got to be at work the next day.
I think sometimes we all wonder how on earth everyone who writes a blog or takes a photo can possibly believe the rest of the world will be interested in their perspective, and why so many artists bother to publish their works if they're not masterpieces or money-making ventures. All artists know the enjoyment there is in creation, but there is another side to art that many miss, and that is sharing it with the world.
When I was younger I used to draw and sculpt and paint and write, and never once while I was in the process of illustrating my perspective did I imagine someone else's response to my work. When it was finished, however, I'd shyly present it to whomever was nearby, suddenly unsure of my own perspective, suddenly thirsty for approval where I hadn't been before. Something happened to me as an artist when the world outside viewed pieces of my soul through the windows I created, and I realized that my perspective is not interesting to all or even most of the viewers. I determined then that I didn't want to create art for the purpose of showing it to others, and so I thought it best to always create it just for myself and leave others out of it, expecting no understanding or appreciation so that I'd be surprised if any were demonstrated.
But what I, the young artist, did not know is that there is only one of each of us artists, but there are billions of art appreciators out there in the world. The odds are greatly in favor of your work touching just one person's soul, and that is reason enough to present your window to the world.
If I am moved by one woman's words describing friends she met in her travels or battles she fought in her own mind, by one man's photo of his lover on the rooftop of their apartment, by one actress's facial expression, or by one painter's colors, I cannot imagine the number of things that move other people. I know that for myself, I will continue to plunge boldly into the world of art, absorbing that which interests me and leaving the rest for others, knowing they might find it incredible when I see only boring faces or a hear a tired story. And I will continue to write and sculpt and take photographs without regard for my audience, knowing that I am valuable only because I am the only artist with exactly this view.